The Anomalies of Correspondence

An anomaly is something unexpected, and writing – in order to be interesting – invariably contains elements of the unexpected.  We speak of composing letters, and of composition as the art of writing, but if you refer to someone as a composer it is a musician who comes to mind rather than a writer.  That is no coincidence.  As Oliver Sacks has proven time and again, there is something lyrical and even magical in the writing and exchanging of letters:

“Correspondence is also a major part of life.  On the whole, I enjoy writing and receiving letters – it is an intercourse with other people, particular others – and I often find myself able to write letters when I cannot “write”, whatever Writing (with a capital W) means.”  This passage comes from the next to last page of On the Move: A Life, the new autobiography from Oliver Sacks which I just breathlessly finished.  The last sentence of the book reads as follows: “Over a lifetime, I have written millions of words, but the act of writing seems as fresh, and as much fun, as when I started nearly seventy years ago.”

Sacks On The Move

It isn’t entirely clear whether Sacks penned the last sentence before receiving news of his death sentence, about which he wrote so poignantly in his February 2015 Op-Ed essay.  But the sentiment is that writing itself continues to breath life into whatever time the good Dr. Sacks has remaining.  This is a very personal book, and one that I took my time savoring throughout the past week, finding myself underlining, highlighting, and making margin notes so often that I might have passed for “Inky” – one of Oliver’s many early nicknames.  It’s a wild ride, exposing readers to sides of Oliver about which he has been intentionally cryptic for years.   For fans of the good doctor, the cover photo of Sacks melding with his cycle has now officially displaced the iconic Brando motorcycle image.

Brando Cycle

The coming out of On the Move was celebrated in a relatively private way last week, as reported by The Observer.  It was from that reportage that I learned of this insightful piece in June’s Vanity Fair by Lawrence Weschler about Sacks, insights gleaned from a 40 year relationship that began with the exchange of letters.

Sacks has endured his share of criticism, as David Strumfels recently noted, yet I doubt that he has any harsher critic than himself.  Oliver has been quoted in the past as saying that “I don’t feel proud of anything” yet one gets the feeling after finishing his autobiography that perhaps now, with death at his doorstep, he rightfully shares pride in what he has accomplished.  Joyce Haase has a wonderful Pinterest page that celebrates Dr. Sacks’s lifelong love of learning, and his sharing of knowledge with an artistic flair.

Sacks Pinterest

About Leonard J. Press, O.D., FAAO, FCOVD

Developmental Optometry is my passion as well as occupation. Blogging allows me to share thoughts in a unique visual style.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Anomalies of Correspondence

  1. doctuhdon says:

    many thanks for the recommendation. I have always enjoyed Sacks’ writings, though this criticism has some sting to it: Sacks was called “the man who mistook his patients for a literary career” by British academic and disability-rights activist Tom Shakespeare

  2. You’re welcome. Sacks is a very special writer and individual. When you read the book, you’ll see the context of the crticism that he encountered – particularly earlier in his career, which he handles very well.

  3. Dr. Gary Williams says:

    Len, I enjoyed your commentary. I don’t know how someone writes of their private life like that. Coming out? A message for the world that this is OK? It is a compelling read. Gary

  4. Thanks, Gary. Takes courage to address his personal life issues, which he clearly has struggled with for a long time, first in dealing with his parents (his mother, in particular), then ultimately deciding what to share and how to share it. Coming out today has ample precedent that the angst has to be less than it would have been 50 years ago, but that is a value judgement Sacks leaves to the individual reader. I suspect that’s part of what makes this such a compelling read.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s